From: Torsten
Message: 65157
Date: 2009-09-30
> > > Can you explain Greek <tri:'bo:> 'I rub', 2nd aor. pass....
> > > <etri'be:n> with short /i/?
> >
> > Greek is not my strong suit, but this one I think I can handle by
> > means of another rule I proposed; see the discussion starting in
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/46106
> > and
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/47212
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/46183
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/49523
> > In casu: tri:b- is a cross between the forms occurring in 3sg
> > *tréIb- and 3pl *trimb-´.
>
> > Perhaps we can estimate at least the distribution of /a/ vs....
> > e/o/zero from their respective occurrence in eg the *d/tran,W-
> > root in hydronyms, note Udolph's dicussion of the distribution of
> > the roots *Drag- vs. *Dreg- in
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/61626
> > if that root is IE at all; and besides it may just be the name in
> > the language of the people using the rivers for transport, note
> > the Dutch origin of hydronyms such as Kattegat, Skagerrak, North
> > Sea (from Dutch-made charts).
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/58462
> > bottom (but I stick to my semantics for it).
>
> >Re your tri:bo: : when I tried to establish the semantic extent of the putative *d/tran,W- root,
> > > > Class VI 'draw' vs. class I 'drive', perhaps (all of class VI
> > > > strong verbs are best explained as PPGmc -a-/-a:-/-a:-/-a- >
> > > > PGmc -a-/-o:-/-o:-/-a-), Engl. grab vs OIc grípa, Engl. wag
> > > > vs. OIc víkja "move"?