From: tgpedersen
Message: 65029
Date: 2009-09-16
> One final (which is actually the first) point about Snorri. He wasSo Snorri lied, because Nestor lied?
> an Icelander who thought in Icelandic geographical terms. His
> geography was very much a "Viking" one. For centuries before he
> wrote (and certainly for Icelanders and Norwegians, Danes, and
> Swedes) the route eastward was a sea route not a land route. And as
> late as the 11th century the main route westward for Old Ukrainians
> was also a sea route (under the influence of their Norse-origin
> dynasts). The famous "route from the Greeks to the Varangians".
> When the Kyivan Herodotus Nestor (1057-1116) wrote about the visit
> of the Apostle Andrew to Kyiv (itself a fictional development from
> the notion that Andrew evangelized "Scythia") he had him travel
> back to Rome to his brother Peter by that route: up the Dnipro,
> shift to the Lovat', via Novgorod then into the Baltic, then
> westward to the North Sea, then southward via the Atlantic to the
> pillars of Hercules, then into the Mediterranean and then Rome. And
> this is precisely the route Snorri's Odin also took from "Asgard"
> to "Saxland" (via "Gardariki" as Old Rus' was called by the
> Vikings). This route did not exist in the 1rst c. CE as the major
> thoroughfare it later became. And no East Slavic historian has ever
> suggested that Nestor's idea of Andrew's travel reflected "popular
> tradition". Nestor could fantasize as well as as Snorri or Master
> Vincent. In him, as in Snorri, as in Vincent, one must distinguish
> the valuable from the chaff. That has always been the main task of
> professional mediaevalists. And by and large they have done an
> excellent job.