Re: Aryan invasion theory and race

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "david_russell_watson" <liberty@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "shivkhokra" <shivkhokra@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "david_russell_watson" <liberty@> wrote:
> > >
> > > "Shivraj" wouldn't know science if it hit him in the head,
> > > George. I too have interacted with him on IndiaArchaeology.
> >
> > Let us see if you can give us an example of the above
> > statement. Otherwise this is ad-hominen attack.
>
> Already given. As a follower of Dayananda

No. Not a follower of Dayananda.

> you believe in
> reincarnation

Yes I do. If you do not know reincarnation has nothing to do with Dayananda. You may want to follow this thread about rg veda and reincarnation:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/64821

<Dayanananda refs>

The debate on vedic Gods is the context where Dayananda was quoted. If you were to quote as an example David Duke does that make you Ku Klux Klan? Asking you to read Dayananda to clarify a point in a debate is *citing a reference*.

> > You may want to read Panini and Mbh about Rajputs.
>
> Neither Panini nor any contributor to the Mahabharata
> was an historian or scientist of any sort that they
> would have last word, or any word for that matter, on
> the origin of the Rajputs.

Then please explain who should have the last word on the origin of rajputs and why?

>
> > > "Shivraj Singh" is, moreover, recognized by Wikipedia as what
> > > they call a "sock puppet" (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> > > Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry ), which information was relayed to me
> > > by Francesco and which I relayed to the IndiaArchaeology list,
> > > but which post seems to have now disappeared, at least I can't
> > > locate it with the search function. Did you happen to record
> > > that post and have the message number, Francesco?
> >
> > Sorry you must be talking about someone else. Have not edited
> > wikipedia in many years. But what is the relevance here?
>
> The relevance is to the question of whether you're even
> worth taking the trouble to debate. I doubt that many
> people would care to waste their precious time debating
> a fundamentalist, much less a puppet for such ideology.
>

I have never been a sockpuppet on wikipedia. Left that forum many years back. No one is asking you to debate with us. We promise to not miss you! But we are happy to answer any and all of your questions.

Regards,
Shivraj