From: tgpedersen
Message: 64757
Date: 2009-08-16
>Kuhn's ar-/ur- language is characterized by that alternation, the apa-/upe- "stream" alternation he tries to distribute geographically (apa- west, upe- east); Schrijver's definition of his geminate and bird name languages implies a wide range of variation in auslaut and root vowel. Individual languages may hide behind this. THey are not to be taken more literally as a single language than Krahe's Old European.
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "caotope" <johnvertical@> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Khanty is spoken a few thousands of kilometers away from the
> >> Germanic hartlands. I don't buy the idea that pre-IE/Uralic
> >> northern Europe/Siberia spoke only one language.
>
> > Because?
>
> Because languages change over time, and vast distances imply
> considerable temporal differentiation.
> [...]??
>
> > But the languages around them swarm with lookalikes which must be
> > ultimately related, [...]
>
> An article of faith, apparently.
> >> *kansa "people": Outside of Fennoscandia, the only positedOh, that one. Yes, you're right, John apparently gave up on Udmurt and Komi. That family is larger, but that would take a separate posting.
> >> cognates are Udmurt kuz, Komi goz, which do not correspond
> >> even to _one another_ (viz. the initial stop voicing; otherwise
> >> possible from *kansa). Also, they mean "pair". Germanic > Samic
> >> contacts are kno'n to exist so that doesn't pose a problem.
>
> > Please explain how Germanic-Saami contacts solve the problem.
>
> By making <kansa> a loan from (pre-Grimm) Gmc., I presume.