From: G&P
Message: 64679
Date: 2009-08-10
>> Of course. The "f" in infans is analogical, instead of *imbans, likePiotr replied:
>> infusio, infidelis, etc.
>But analogical to what? <-fa:ns> is a bound form, not a free-standingIsn't that a little disingenuous, Piotr? It would analogous to the forms
>word.