Res: [SPAM] Re: [tied] Barba and Bestia: bH>b (dissimilation) - ERRA

From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 64669
Date: 2009-08-09

Of course. The "f" in infans is analogical, instead of *imbans, like infusio, infidelis, etc.

JS Lopes

De: Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...>
Para: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Sábado, 8 de Agosto de 2009 14:14:36
Assunto: Re: [SPAM] Re: [tied] Barba and Bestia: bH>b (dissimilation) - ERRATA

 

On 2009-08-08 19:02, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> Douglas has already mentioned this possibility: *n.-bHardHi- 'having no
> beard' > *in-BarBi- > imberbis (OTOH we have <infamis> and <informis>).

P.S. Here of course analogy working in the reverse direction could be
assumed (<i:nfa:mis> after <fa:ma>, etc.), but an /f/ of analogical
origin is much less likely in the case of <i:nfa:ns>.

Piotr


Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! + Buscados: Top 10 - Celebridades - Música - Esportes