From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 64489
Date: 2009-07-30
> No one denied this. The point is that these are not relatedI would add that the latter (< *k^wento-) may have been conflated with
> to the 'holy' word. Read Vasmer more carefully: for the one
> he gives 'Praslav. *sve^tU', for the other. 'Praslav.
> *sveNtU'.