From: tgpedersen
Message: 64338
Date: 2009-07-05
>Thanks. Just ordered it.
>
>
> --- On Sun, 7/5/09, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> Scholar, not scholars. Boosen.
> GK: He cites others.
> Erh, OK.
> (GK) So that whatever changes are noted in the Oder/Warthe and
> other regions in the 1rst c. BCE are changes due to internal
> dynamics (and afterwards with interaction with the Romans), not to
> cultural or other influxes from the east.
>
> The interesting part is that the provenance of these new elements
> are not discussed at all.
>
> GK: Well you picked the source. Find a better one. Surely there
> are archaeological publications which comment on the identity and
> provenance of these inventories at least broadly "local" vs.
> "imports". The ball's in your court here.
>
> I haven't seen any. Do you feel up to the task of discussing the
> provenance of those particular grave goods which should or
> shouldn't be there?
>
> ****GK:Have a look at V. Mordvinceva's "Sarmatian Phalerae" It's a
> publication of the Deutsches Archeologisches Institut, Eurasien-
> Abteilung (around 2001?== particulars available on line. Check
> "Sarmatian phalerae".) I haven't looked at this, but it should give
> a pretty goods idea of one item to expect in a Sarmatian grave. Of
> course, cremation burials can be crossed out immediately. Other
> things to be checked: body position; weapons; ceramics;
> jewellery.*****