From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 64161
Date: 2009-06-12
> Yes, but not the way you'd like to close it. On second thoughts there isOf couyrse I mean *monh2áje/o-
> a really fatal objection to such a reconstruction. Your hypothetical
> *monh2-eje/o- would have been realised as *monáh2je/o-,
> which would havePiotr
> yielded Lat. +mono: (< *monájo:), not moneo:, cf. domo: < *domh2ájo:.