[SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2009-06-05 00:09, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > I didn't read that article so I don't know Jens' arguments.
> > But if you have invoked it, your are obliged to go with that
> > argumentation till the end.
> >
> > Otherwise you have only asserted that:
> > "h2 must be suffixal because you have understood this from an honorable
> > person"
>
> Or you may read the article yourself (it was published in the Copenhagen
> Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 1992). In a nutshell, root-final *-h2
> (or the collective suffix) and *-(e)h2 (with an underlying vowel) behave
> differently in the word-final position.
>
> Piotr

Piotr if you use this, as an argument here, you need at least to sustain it, even it was written in Copenhaga.

The basic questions to what you have written above is:

Why h2 doesn't belong to the stem? So based on what it wasn't simple gWenh2-?

Marius