Re: [SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

On 2009-06-04 19:25, alexandru_mg3 wrote:

> Piotr, if you asked me again these 2 questions, this means that I have
> posted the e-mails:
>
> - regarding the existence of non-nil-eh1- forms (either o-grade or
> e-grade)...(the quoted examples was also for 'familiar, normally
> ablauting roots')

The full e-grade in derivatives of *sed- is not surprising, as there is
some evidence of a Narten present (*se:d-/*sed-) from this root. Still,
no fientive in *o, and the only unambiguous example you gave was the
monster reconstruction "*louhk-eh1-". Familiar indeed.

> P.S. Also there wasn't any schwa in PIE, as you supposed for m&n-eh1-,
> m&rei, m&n- > manus...

I asked how _you_ could know there was no laryngeal in the preforms of
<mare> and <manus>. You haven't answered my question.

Piotr