[SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2009-06-04 10:07, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > P.S. And I will come next to this supposed 'impossibility' CERH/CREH and
> > > I will show you a flexion pattern of the same word showing this alternance.
> >
> > Do read Anttila first, or you'll be reinventing the wheel.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
>
> Yes I read him, but it was you that created confusions here, putting in discussion (by intention) the Schwebeablaut ...
>
> Maybe you can explain dieus- forms again for everybody here regarding the vowel position inside ---> and to tell to everybody here that there is no Schwebeablaut issue regarding such forms
> BUT we have the vowel -e- IN TWO DIFFERENT PLACES
>
> Again the 'general' mixture with Schwebeablaut was put in equation by you, by intention, in place to explain concretely each form ....
>
> Marius

Another clear example is that one of gWenh2- 'woman, wife'

The Nominative and Accusative forms show gWénh2-

But the Obliques Forms show gWnéh2- :

[gen.] gWnéh2-s
[dat.] gWnéh2-(e)i


So the accentual pattern is CeRH- in Nominative and CReH- for Genitive/Dative

This clearly show you that this alternance EXISTS.

Is this an Schwebeablaut issue, here, Piotr? For sure NOT...

So why you have created confusions by invoking it?

Marius