[SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63998
Date: 2009-06-03

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
>
> At 5:15:07 PM on Tuesday, June 2, 2009, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > (regarding 'beget' -> 'family' -> 'son-in-law' this is Ok;
> > even a son-in-low has some 'blood links' with my 'blood
> > links', isn't it?
>
> Maybe -- if you buy your blood sausage from the same
> butcher.
>
> <http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bl%C5%8Ddmearh>
>
> Brian
>

Brian, I try to keep it simple for you:
the 'son-in-law' genes will arrive to your offsprings too together with your genes...

so 'to beget' -> 'family' -> 'clan' , 'son-in-law' is OK


Now is your turn to explain :

'to know' -> 'son-in-law' :)

why not

'to know' -> 'dog' supposing that you know well your dogs :) or 'horse' or 'sheep'



Same question for Piotr.


Marius