From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63989
Date: 2009-06-02
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------And I remembered correctly :
> > > Goth. kno:dai [dat.sg.f.] 'family' *g^noh1-
> > > Skt jña:ti 'kinsman *g^noh1-ti-
> > > Latv. znuõts 'son-in-law' *g^noh1-t-
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hardly any other? How come that most linguists interpret the word as
> > *g^noh3-ti- 'known, recognised' (see Lubotsky for I-Ir. and Derksen for
> > Balto-Slavic), perhaps secondarily contaminated with *g^enh1- in Lith.
> > z^éntas. I, for one, wouldn't like to beget my own son-in-law, but I'd
> > like to know him.
> >
> > Piotr
> (even for Lubotsky I'm not sure, as I remember)
> Marius