From: tgpedersen
Message: 63904
Date: 2009-05-07
>Well, thank you, but not quadruply so.
> --- On Thu, 5/7/09, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> From: tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...>
> > OK, but we also have *kot- as in cottage I forget all its
> > cogeners
> > but I'm sure they're in the files somewhere, if not in Hubschmid
> > et al.
>
> True, I forgot to mention those. And this:
> http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ cybalist/ message/5929
>
> On the -unya suffix:
> http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ cybalist/ message/51061
>
> Torsten
> A true and cunning linguist you are.
> The s-kut/s-gud does need to be looked atif cott is "shelter",Not in my book; I see them as the oppressed original population of most Scandinavia who left for greener pastures south of the Baltic, but under leaders who were part of the Odinist invaders (which is why we know Gothic as a Germanic language). That explains the mixed cremation/inhumation, they are a characteristic of the respective groups, as also claimed by Snorri. BTW, if the Goths had a leading layer who kept to themselves, that would explain the later limpieza de sangre etc traditions and why their language left so little mark in the Romance countries they conquered.
> maybe the Goths are "protectors", i.e. originally a martial clan;
> but skut- was also linked to "pirate, darkness" in Scot and Scythia