Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language

From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 62971
Date: 2009-02-10

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick McCallister" <gabaroo6958@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language


>
> Fellow cornuti:
>
> We really don't need to start WWIII over whether mi:lvuus has short or
> long /i/, do we?
> And what are the consequences if it does or not?
>
===========
There's no "whether"
as we know for sure that the word is attested with both a short and a long
i(:) depending on the author.
But the real issue is we have people in that field who cannot even read.
Pathetic.

A.