Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language

>
> BTW, Arnaud, I've got Ernout-Meillet in my hands and it reads mi:luus with
> LONG i:.
> So either you were lying or else you've got a poor vision.
>
> ======
> L'un n'empêche pas l'autre, n'est-ce pas ?
>
> You must have a poor vision or you have no idea what the latinistic
> conventions are :
> bottom of page 582 : mi:les long i with straight line
> bottom of page 583 : miluus short i with curved line
> It reads miluus with a short i.
> Ernoult-Meillet does not mention any long i:
>

What edition do you have?
Mine is a reimpression of the 4th edition (1959). top page 403 reads
mi:luus with a LONG i:
Please check your sources, otherwise you'll lost the little credit you're
keeping.

========

I have the first edition printed in October 1931 in Chartres, rue Fulbert
par l'Imprimerie Durand.
In-8, pleine percaline, XIX-1108 pages.
What else do you need to know ?

You have made me check that page already so many times it's wearing faster
than the others.

Arnaud