From: tgpedersen
Message: 62334
Date: 2009-01-01
>Thank you and szcze,s´liwego nowego roku to you.
> On 2009-01-01 11:00, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > Ok, so what you're saying is that the language families usually
> > considered independent of IE, eg. Uralic, Semitic, Austronesian,
> > Basque, Kartvelian, Uto-Aztecan, Bantu, Khoi-San, are in fact IE?
> > That is a very unusual point of view.
>
> More specifically, they are Indo-Iranian, which is even more
> revolutionary. It seems to mean that, e.g. Sanskrit is more closely
> related to Navajo than it is to Greek or Latin (unless Greek and
> Latin are Indo-Iranian too).
>
> Happy New Year, everyone,