From: stlatos
Message: 62298
Date: 2008-12-28
>I made no claims about the origin of sitar; you said I was wrong
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Also, I never said k > s (or anything similar) before new y.
> > > > The message in this thread that apparently sparked the recent
> > > > question is below; complain to him if you disagree.
> > >
> > > No need to complain. An obvious blunder on my part, as the
> > > present discussion of <sitar> has shown. <guitar> and <zither>
> > > derive from <kítHaris, kitHára>, <sitar> doesn't.
> >
> > He didn't have any need to complain about my answer, but he
> > did anyway.
>
> I didn't complain about your post, but merely denied the claims
> therein.
> > I don't think you made an obvious blunder; the existence of EE = English
> > three-peat doesn't mean E repeat isn't related by borrowing
> > to Romance words.
>
> I'm afraid I don't know what "E three-peat" and "E repeat" mean,
> but if you're trying to claim that 'sitar' could have given riseI didn't say anything at all about that direction of borrowing. My
> to 'zither', 'guitar', then again I have to express my doubts.
> The question isn't one of comparing the form of the words alone,Since I didn't know anything about it, I said nothing. My response
> it must be understood. Quite a bit is known about the history
> of these musical instruments and their designations, with which
> facts any theory about their etymologies needs to accord.