From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 62241
Date: 2008-12-21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] [MTLR] Re: The paradox of the Basco-Caucasian hypothesis
>
> On 2008-12-21 15:01, Arnaud Fournet wrote:
>
>> By the way,
>> you still have not answered my little question about H1 in tomH1os.
>> I'm still interested.
>
> Sorry, I must have missed the question. Do you mean, how do we know
> there's an *h1 at the end of the root (*temh1-)? The chief witness is
> Greek, where e.g. the verbal adjective is *tme:tós < *tm.h1-tó-. If the
> root were simply *tem-, we would get +tatós < *tm.-tó-. There is also
> some extra-Greek evidence -- reflexes of the nasal present
> *tm.neh1-/*t(m)n.h1-, but they don't indicate a particular laryngeal.
>
> Piotr
>
=======
Sorry about the previous mail, I just clicked on the wrong button.
One more question,
What about temnô I cut ?
Should it not be **temenô ??
A.