Re: *y-n,W- "subordinate"?

From: G&P
Message: 61797
Date: 2008-11-22

>Piotr, why not to organize the construction of such a dictionary, on
>this forum,

A great deal of the labour could be saved if (at least initially) we didn’t simply repeat information in Pokorny, but instead concentrated on identifying the newly-spelled roots with suffixes (perhaps also with whatever information is needed to justify the new reconstruction), and otherwise, where possible, simply referring to Pokorny for details of the attested languages.

Peter


Previous in thread: 61790
Next in thread: 61798
Previous message: 61796
Next message: 61798

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts