Re: *y-n,W- "subordinate"?

From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 61764
Date: 2008-11-20

----- Original Message -----
From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>

>> > >> >
>> > >> > That particular loan Piotr admitted the possible existence of a
>> > >> > long time ago.
>> > >> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/36633
>> > >> >
>> >
>> > The message reads :
>>
>> > the formal and semantic match betweem PIE *h2jw- and Semitic
>> > *h.yw- is striking indeed and may point to ancient borrowing (or
>> > to Nostratic inheritance, _if_ there are possible matches in other
>> > families).
>> > >
>
> Universal Reason strikes again.
>
> Piotr, would you, or should I try again?
>
>
> Torsten
>
==============

Torsten, you are just wrong,
but this does not matter that much,

What strikes me in the message 36633 is the neutrality toward Nostratic and
LR inheritance.
It seems M. Gasiorowski is now "shying away" from that kind of hypotheses.
The tendency has shifted from neutrality toward passive hostility.

Maybe this would be an issue on which to get some interesting comments.

Arnaud

Previous in thread: 61763
Next in thread: 61765
Previous message: 61763
Next message: 61765

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts