From: bmscotttg
Message: 61722
Date: 2008-11-18
> From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...>Search the archives for 'O-fix'.
> > Pavel A. da Mek wrote:
> >> So it seems to me that the loss of the laryngeal and the 1st
> >> vocalisation had to work simultaneously - if the clusters was too
> >> complex, then it was simplified by deleting of the laryngeal AND
> >> by the vocalisation of the consonantal /O/, although either of
> >> these two changes would alone be enough to get an acceptable
> >> cluster.
> Is it possible to explain what this consonantal /O/ means ?