From: etherman23
Message: 61670
Date: 2008-11-16
>Come on over to http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/uralica/ so that we
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "etherman23" <etherman23@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>
> >> How reliable are reconstructions of non-IE families?
> >> I realize there are 3 or so reconstructions of Afro-Asiatic, all by
> > respected scholars. But how do they compare with IE reconstruction?
> >> Also Uralic et al. Do we really have anything truly well elaborated
> > to compare with yet?
> >>
> >
> > Uralic is very well elaborated. There are open issues, of course, but
> > that's no different from PIE or any other language family.
> =======
>
> As i have pointed at before,
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/55999
>
> Proto-Uralic reconstruction is bad.