From: tgpedersen
Message: 61537
Date: 2008-11-11
>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/53968
> On 2008-11-11 00:15, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > I have no problem with positing a loan into Greek from Venetic.
> > After all, they were at Troy too.
>
> Did the Tocharians borrow from them too? And *wa(:)g^-, in
> particular, is even more widespread (cf. Skt. vájra-, not to
> mention a Hittite cognate).
> As none of your "Venetic loans" is attested in Venetic, it seemsThe reason 'toler', 'doto' and 'donasto/tonasto' are about the only
> the Veneti loaned away most of their verbs and ended up practically
> verbless themselves.
> > > *perh3-, *melh2- or *h2anh1-, with a final consonant cluster.Erh, what?
> >
> > I've grown suspicious of those roots with laryngeals in auslaut,
> > ghosts of departed quantities, most likely.
>
> Does such a ghost haunt *waskanã 'wash' as well?
> Are the Skt. /i/ in <ániti> and Gk. /e/ in <ánemos> ghosts of aActually, that's exactly what I think h1 denotes. No one knows what
> departed quantity?
> Is the Luwian /h/ in <ma:lhu:-> an illusion?No, evidence is evidence, as I think it was you wanted to lecture me