Re: [pieml] Labiovelars versus Palatals + Labiovelar Approximant

From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 61106
Date: 2008-10-31

----- Original Message -----
From: Edgard Bikelis

>
>> Latin can-is better fits kh2n-
>
> But it doesn't fit *k^uh2(o)n-, and that's what you proposed. *k^uh2n-
> would have given Lat. *cu:n-. Did the *u disappear just like that?

==========
When unstressed, all vowels disappear in PIE stage,
so kuH2on- when stressed on kuH2on-""i
becomes kH2n-""i > kan-""i
U disappears like all other vowels do.
No big deal.
Arnaud
============


So *k'lu-tós should be *k'.l-tós? *wid-tós *udtós or *dtós? ; ). I can't see
how the cognates could come from that. What about the thematic vowel? Is
there any other word whose etymology can be saved with this rule besides
canis?

Edgard.

========
*u in *kuh2on- is a vowel.
*w in wid-tos is a consonant.

they have nothing in common.

Arnaud
===========