From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 61087
Date: 2008-10-29
----- Original Message -----
From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> ======
>
> Are you sure
> the way you are using "Venetic"
> makes any sense and has any relationship
> with the way Lejeune uses "Vénète" ?
I hope it makes sense. That's for everyone to decide for himself.
I use it in the 'Pokorny-sense'.
========
I don't understand what this means.
Please explain.
Arnaud
========
> I'm afraid you are calling someone
> as a witness for your "hyper-Venetic" case
> Who does not support anything of your own theories.
Fear not. I'm quoting Lejeune, not calling him upon him as witness for
anything.
=========
You are using the coincidence of your theory being called "venetic"
and Lejeune's language being called "Venète"
as a reason to quote Lejeune's book.
Therefore calling upon him as a witness,
I think he would disagree.
Arnaud
=========