From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 61022
Date: 2008-10-21
> At 4:08:22 PM on Monday, October 20, 2008, raucousd wrote:What should be pointed out to Raucous D is that breaking is not a
> > It never crossed my mind. I'm basically quoting G&I plus
> > Mallory & Adams and I'm fairly sure it never crossed their
> > minds either. A form like Easter based on *aster, looks
> > like breaking, a very common feature of Anglo-Saxon
> > vowels.
>
> The OE is <e:astre>, nom. pl. <e:astron>, from PGmc.
> *austro:n-; PGmc. *au > OE /e:a/ is regular. (It also isn't
> an instance of breaking, which was not triggered by a
> following /s/.)