From: stlatos
Message: 60769
Date: 2008-10-10
>accepted
> On 2008-10-09 21:19, stlatos wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cybalist%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> > I quoted it to refute yor counterexample, not to offer a
> > > different analysis of the 'dawn' word. *h2seus- 'dry' is also
> > > in this shape by the LIV.Then there's no evidence of any *h2seus- with e-grade?
> >
> > How would that give OE se:ar?
>
> *(h2)sous-ó-, a different adjective from the same root (thus also in
> Balto-Slavic).
> Ringe proposes *sausó-, with a fundamental *a (whichIf original plain stem *sxaus-, *sxus-me, etc., both grades could
> Lubotsky of course doesn't believe in), but I'm not convinced that
> *saus-/*sus- is an acceptable ablaut pattern, and we definitely need
> *sus- to account for some of the verb forms.
> > There could have been metathesis of *sxausos > *x,sausos in everyI think a compound is more likely than a suffix -auos.
> > form and dialect, but if so, *asausos > *ahauhos > Hom auos and Att
> > hauos (showing optional met. of medial h like heuo:, hieros) but no
> > s>h after x in Laconian *asauhos > *azauos > addauos.
>
> A derivative of <aza> 'heat, dryness' rather than anything directly to
> do with <auos> (unless it's a compound of both.