From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 60724
Date: 2008-10-09
----- Original Message -----
From: "stlatos" <stlatos@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>>
>> > This was PIE *xauswo:s with dissim. of u-w > u-0 in most (not Greek
>> > *auswo:s > *a:uso:s).
>>
>> You have the rather irritating habit of saying "it was PIE *X" when you
>> really mean "I believe it was PIE *X". As the reconstruction seems
> to be
>> a private idea of yours, you might at least justify it somehow. Why not
>> *h2auso:s > *auho:s > *a:wos, etc.?
>
> Because *sxausos > hauos, etc., with no long a:u.
>
============
Interestingly, s.abaH 'morning' could be a cognate.
What about H2ewH1-s "dawn" ?
Arnaud
=============