--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Jarrette" <anjarrette@...>
wrote:
nevertheless 8000 B.C. sounds reasonable as a possible genesis-
> time for PIE to me at least (most will say later than that, right?).
>
> AJ
>
Or maybe "splitting-time (splitting-point)" rather than genesis-point,
if PIE is as old as you (Arnaud) believe, which I can believe too. I
waver on this point, sometimes acceding to customary opinion, sometimes
entertaining more radical ideas (similar to yours). We need a time
machine.
AJ