--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
>
> A substantial number of *a(: )- initials in PIE roots are the
> result of this process: *a(: )kWa( : )-.
So you just offer unproven claims from your personal theory as
proof for other claims from the same theory?
I think the problem may be that all of your education has been
in the humanities, is that not so? There's nothing wrong with
such study, but there seems to be a gap in your grasp of basic
logic and the scientific process which you would not have been
able to get from those courses alone that you've related to us.
Circularity like that above, to name one, is a flaw of many of
your arguments.
David