From: george knysh
Message: 60285
Date: 2008-09-24
--- On Wed, 9/24/08, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
--- In cybalist@... s.com, "david_russell_ watson" <liberty@... >
wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@... s.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@ > wrote:
> >
> > No Aryan invasion ever overtly claimed that. It's implicit in all
> > such theories.
>
> Oh is it, in all theories? I've certainly never subscribed
> myself to any theory claiming India was invaded by Celts or
> Scandinavians.
Any history about a ruling class traces also their claim to rule. Even
if linguists won't use those histories that way, other people will.
The other day I saw a Swedish-Kurdish stand-upper tell his audience
that 'Actually, Odin was Kurd!'
****GK: What do you mean a Kurd? Everybody knows that "Odin" (='the One' in Ukr. cf.also the Matrix) was a Ukrainian! And that this piece of information stems from refugees who went west after 1117, when Tmutorokan(=Troy/Asgard) was captured by the Cumans. These refugees passed the info on to the Scandinavian pretorians of the Prince of Chernihiv, some of whom were Norwegians and Icelanders. They passed it on to Snorri. The urge to recapture Asgard/Tmutorokan lies behind the Lay of Prince Igor (composed ca. 1187). So there (:=))) [From: 'Unpublished Notes of a Ukrainian Kook' (name withheld to protect the guilty).****