Re: Oedipus

Vous pouvez m'adresser en français, si vous voulez. O forse in italiano.

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Francisco Antonio Doria
>
> We have evidence for a Tawagalawas/Eteokles; we have evidence for a

Kádmos

> at Thebes. What more evidence, if any, do we have for the existence

of a

> historical Oedipus?
>
> ==========
>
> By the way,
> our predecessors have chosen a soft bourgeois interpretation of

oidi-pe:s as

> standing for pous "foot". Swollen foot ?
> What is the reason to reject a more straightforward post-bourgeois

option

> of -pe:s standing for *pes "penis" ? Swollen ** ?
> Makes more sense !?
> What would be your comments ?
> Has it been suggested already ?
>
> Arnaud
>
> PS
> I suppose you need to be a little bit "French" to propose that,
> I'm afraid I won't apologize for that !
>