From: Rick McCallister
Message: 60208
Date: 2008-09-21
At 4:57:06 PM on Saturday, September 20, 2008, tgpedersen
wrote:
[...]
> This is how I imagined the -en- > -in- rule of GermanicPre-nasal raising (*e > *i / _NC) is distinct from i-umlaut
> happened.
> Once it inflected:
> *sprenga *sprengm.
> *sprengis *sprengiþ
> *sprengiþ *sprengn.þ
> with umlaut
> *sprenga *sprengm.
> *springis *springiþ
> *springiþ *sprengn.þ
> generalized
> *springa *springm.
> *springis *springiþ
> *springiþ *springn.þ
> vel sim., Brian!
You mean "inkpin" ;p My cousins in West Virginia used to answer "Gimme a pen" with "Hw@ kan@ pIn? A streytpIn or @n inkpIn?"
Some Scots, of course do the opposite --I've heard people from Glasgow say /s^Et, @m pEst/