From: Andrew Jarrette
Message: 60038
Date: 2008-09-15
>What I wrote: "Well, I'd much rather take "battlefield" over "crooked
> At 6:03:44 PM on Sunday, September 14, 2008, Andrew Jarrette wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> > <BMScott@> wrote:
>
> >> At 5:12:30 PM on Sunday, September 14, 2008, Andrew Jarrette
> >> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> Well, I'd much rather take "battlefield" over "crooked
> >>> mouth" for the meaning of name of my ancestors, untrue
> >>> though it may be.
>
> >> Good grief, why? Surely the facts are more interesting,
> >> and in this case there's really no doubt; see the
> >> discussion in Black, _Surnames of Scotland_.
>
> > Good grief, can't you see why?
>
> No, not really: whatever it may have been originally, it's
> now been an inherited surname for many generations and has
> no meaning beyond (in most cases) 'my father's surname was
> <Campbell>'. And I really don't much care what my ancestors
> were called; that was their problem.
>
> > Who wants to be known as "Andrew Crookedmouth" (or, say,
> > "Andrew Bignose")? "Andrew Battlefield" at least has some
> > suggestion of the glory of battle.
>
> But even if you were <Andrew Campbell>, you wouldn't be
> 'Andrew Crookedmouth'.
> >>> mouth" for the !!meaning!! of name of my ancestors, untrueThe latter looks more plausible to me, and it's far better than "Leg"
> >>> though it may be" - see exclamation marks around "meaning".
>
> [...]
>
> > But apparently even my name "Jarrette"
>
> It's most likely of patronymic origin, from either of the
> names whose standard forms are now <Gerald> and <Gerard>.
> It's possible but rather less likely that it's a feminine
> form of the French surname <Jarret>, a diminutive of <jarre>
> 'jar', metonymic for a maker or seller of such things.