Re: Sin once more

> > Yes, though I believe that I've finally figured out what
> > you're trying to say. You're claiming that the standard
> > interpretation of <Míl> as a mangled version of <Miles
> > (Hispaniae)> is an attempt to etymologize the Irish name,
> > possibly incorrect, and that any conclusions resting on the
> > interpretation are therefore also tentative. Correct?
>
> Yes.

That's an idiotic position to take.