From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 58989
Date: 2008-06-03
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"[...]
> <BMScott@...> wrote:
>> At 3:37:11 PM on Monday, June 2, 2008, tgpedersen wrote:
>>> And *-ka: is? If that's the general rule, how come thereDepends entirely on what it is, obviously. As I recall,
>>> are so few geminates in Latin (apart from in preverb +
>>> verb combinations)?
>> How common is *TK in any other context?
> If that *-ka: thing had been a real suffix, very common.