From: dgkilday57
Message: 58946
Date: 2008-06-01
>I would be very reluctant to propose that. As others have pointed
> --- dgkilday57 <dgkilday57@...> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister
> > <gabaroo6958@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Although Etruscan had no voiced stops, or at least
> > its
> > > alphabet did not, there are Latin words with
> > voiced
> > > stops that purportedly came from Etruscan. Off the
> > top
> > > of my head, I can think of balteus, the source of
> > > English belt. Would these words have been more
> > likely
> > > to have originally been aspirated or non-aspirated
> > > stops in Etruscan or would it have been impossible
> > to tell?
> >
> > <balteus> is a bad example because the ancients
> > oscillated between
> > Etruscan and Sabine in assigning it. In my opinion
> > <barginna> and
> > <balatro> are probably of Etruscan origin,
> > <batillum> possibly. But
> > the initial Etruscan sound here was /w/, which we
> > transcribe <v>. In
> > some dialects of Late Etruscan and Tuscan Latin, the
> > approximant closed
> > down to the voiced fricative [B] in initial
> > position, represented as
> > Latin <b>, while ordinary Latin still had [w]. Thus
> > while Volaterrae
> > (Etr. Velathri) is still Volterra, Volsinii Novi
> > (Etr. Velznal) has
> > become Bolsena, Vettona Bettona, and Visens
> > Bisenzio. A stream in the
> > Arno valley is called Biesina, from Etr. *Vlesina
> > 'Vlesi's creek'. And
> > a Latin inscription from Etruria, of the 1st cent.
> > BCE, has Baleria for
> > Valeria.
>
> That's interesting. So could /w/ > /v/ in Latin have
> originated under Etruscan influence?