--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
>
> I would be interested in any archaeological
> arguments by OIT proponents backing their theory.
> AFAIK there aren't any.
>
Nobody has looked for them so far. Indian archaeologists are quite
content to dig at Indian sites, which could throw up signs of
invasions, if any, but not of the emigrations of some of their
inhabitants. The OIT paradigm has simply not been developed beyond
the point of denying the AIT.
But the AIT has been the official paradigm for 150 years or so, the
one in which all research resources have been invested. So allow me
to echo your request:
I would be interested in any archaeological arguments by AIT
proponents backing their theory. AFAIK there aren't any.
KE