david_russell_watson schrieb:
>
> If you choose to exercize your right to have then anyway, and
> which right I fully recognize, then I have no choice but to
> exercize my own right to refuse you that part of my resources
> that you're asking for to help take care of them.
>
> Individual freedom cannot be divorced from individual
> responsibility.
>
> David
and we can get back to the origin of the mankind or somewhere in its
childhood. Assuming the state is gone (and with it, all the mechanisms
and instruments to save, protect, make justice or alike) then we are
somewhere back in the stone age. And the one who has more children will
be the one who will have the simply man power to take what he needs.
Implicitely your part of the resources if you are not able to protect
them. If you (generally speaking) don't have the technological advantage
to overpower their number, you will be history in a such scenario.
Or do you think that this kind of poor persons who are not having the
ideals you have, not even the same values about "rights" of groups or
individuals, not the same value about the life of single one person, do
you think this kind of persons will think twice before taking what you
consider to be your part of resources? Unfortunately, my experience I
had, they won't think twice, you will be for them an enemy, simply
because you think a part of the resources should belong to you and they
need it...
And we get back to the ethic and ideal conditions versus reality and
practic problems and maybe we can better undestand why some languages
survive and some not. Sometimes the highest value we discover are not
appreciated by the larges group of a society and maybe your only
survival posibility is to take distance from your values and to act as
these who consider you as being a potential enemy. Maybe this is the
only solutions sometimes while, we should not forget from the very that
begining, homo homini lupus.....
Alex