--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "david_russell_watson" <liberty@...>
wrote:
> > > Of course, but why should the rest of us care? I don't like
> > > nations myself, and would love to see them collapse every one.
> >
Of course: because your ideology (as I alreday said) is a FAR-LEFT
one trying to disolve the states along the history (originally
generated by that ones unhappy with their status of minorities in
other states but having enough power to start to build and especially
to propagate ideologies) => Personally I do not see any benefit not
having States (but of course I also do not like The States that were
built by conquering other etnic groups)
Honestly David you cannot detect that invoking how BAD are the other
IDEOLOGIES: you place yourself Automatically in a context in which
your Ideology (one 'that don't like nations') is considered the GOOD
one and in addition you think also that some supposed GOOD GUYS
(among that ones that 'don't like nations') NEED to TAKE CARE about
the BAD IDEOLOGIES and about the BAD GUYS (I understand now that 'A
BAD GUY' is defined as 'whoever guy that 'like nations'....
If so I'm a BAD GUY, David, for sure!
Should I dissapear because I think so :) ?
You will like this, I suppose.
Hegel, should disappear too, from the History, isn't it :) ?
But who would be "the NAZIST" in this case?
NOW TO EXPLAIN YOU BETTER (even I'm sure that you will apply in all
you will say the same Ideological Dogma "that don't like nations"):
Once you are saying this: you started to live in the Simplest Bipolar
World The GOOD GUYS ('that one that don't like nations') and the BAD
GUYS ('that ones that love nations')
How somebody can arrive to think in such simplistic patterns?
In addition you have invoked several times here a NEED for an
IDEOLOGICAL POLICE (I understand now: of that ones that 'don't like
nations') that should try to preserved "This Right Dogma": IS THE
WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPENED and was usually finalized in the
History with some CRIMES: from US to India, from Germany till
Palestina , from Russia to China, from Japan till Spain, from Latin
America till the South Africa...
Once somebody raised How Bad is the Ideology of The Others there is
no argumentation from that point is only an Ideological Dispute....
In place of this I prefer to have in this forum discussions like :
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The PIE short long o appears in Romanian Substratum words as /a/
(and to give some examples)
2. The PIE short long o appears in Dacian as /a/ too (and to give
some examples)
etc...
And of course you can come with opposite examples if you have some
========> This could be a discussion:
I would say the Only Possible One....
But I'm afraid that this is not possible with the people like
you...sooner or later they will start to invoke the GOOD IDEOLOGY as
their final argument.
Marius
P.S.: Same thing regarding the theory of "India as Origin of Indo-
Europeans" (that personally I do not follow but also I didn't Hate
somebody that simple try to propose this) : you can simple write the
arguments against if you have them ...In place of accusing some
Indian Guys as being Hindu-Nationalists etc...
Finally as I know it wasn't India that has conquered England ...at
least you should remember this....from time to time
Also I don't remember what country was conquered by India in the
past, but I can easy remember some countries conquered by England,
Holland, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, US, Russia, Japan etc..
If you need: I can enumerate here who conquered who, along the
History...Weren't these conquerers finally the BAD GUYS, that have
taken the properties , the work and the lives of the others for FREE?
Seems that for some of you not these ones are the Bad Guys but the
BAD GUYS are that people that have hardly tried to preserve their
identity and to still survive finally as a nation despite several
conquests that they have suffered :)