Re: Drwnt

From: tgpedersen
Message: 58476
Date: 2008-05-14

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> On 2008-05-13 21:15, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > Well, that's what Wiki says, so it's received wisdom. The question I'd
> > like to know the answer of is: Do the British and Continental
> > Derwent-'s have the same etymology? Because if they do, chances are
> > they are Venetic, not Celtic.
>
> The *e looks misplaced for *dr(e)w-n.t- 'running', so *derw-ent-
> ("Oaking"?) or *der(u)-went- 'rich in oaks' is usually accepted for
> the Derwent, but e.g. Peter Kitson (1996, "British and European
> River-Names", Transactions of the Philological Society 94/2: 73-118)
> offers a compromise solution:
>
> "That there is no significant connection between the British group
> [four different rivers Derwent plus a handful of similar names --
> Piotr] and those so similarly formed from a root so productive of
> river-names on the Continent, and most productive in that land of it
> just across the Channel also inhabited by Celts, is more than I for
> one am prepared to believe. I am not saying Ekwall's link with
> <derw> is completely wrong. It is still needed to explain the
> metathesis and vowel of the first syllable of the British names and
> the single Gaulish <Derventum>. What I am suggesting is that the
> <derw-> formation is but a reshaping, by popular etymology, of a
> name-form or of names already existing in the ["Old European"] root
> <Drav-> which were no longer intelligible in the Celtic language."
>
> [Of *der(u)-went-:] "To return to Derwent, I do not think the
> derivation offered above would do better than Ekwall's as an
> _original_ etymology. Rivers may properly be called rich in fish or
> otters, or in alluvial minerals, not trees. Yet as folk-etymology it
> is close enough for a decent sense to keep the logical faculties
> quiet and sound right. There may even have been an element of
> regional idiom in it, since as Ekwall (1928:10-11) notes the rivers
> Allen and Alwin (Northumberland), Alwent Beck (Durham), and Allan
> Water (Roxburgh) are all <Alewent> in the earliest (twelfth- and
> thirteenth-century) sources, in contradistinction to other rivers
> Allen, Allow, etc., with which he connects them.

I'm not sure that's significant. Cf. Udolph, p. 10
"The name of the Drawa/Drage is exempary for the principle that the
oldest occurrence is the one to base something on. The form Dravanz
occurring 1237 stands isolated, it is obviously influenced by the
name of the Drwe,ca/Drewentz, which will be examined in connection
with this name (see below p. l07-). For the interpretation of the name
the oldest occurrence therefore must be kept out of the investigation."

> Ekwall describes
> these as 'mountain streams with a swift current'. His account of the
> names as quasi-participial formations on the etymon of Welsh <alaw>
> ... is not very satisfactory. *Al(u)-went- meaning 'full of flow'
> looks a better try, whether some Celtic variety had borrowed from
> neighbouring north European dialects a word corresponding to
> Lithuanian aluo~ts 'spring' and/or OE ealu 'ale' ...

cf. Ã…lborg < Alabu, the major crossing on the Limfjord
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aalborg

> or whether the nominal base was hypostatized from river-names in
> much the same way as the <derw-> of Derwent."


That is all sound reasoning, and I think it should be applied to the
*weneto- stems too. One advantage of assuming Venetic-speaking pockets
in Britain is that it would finally make sense of Tacitus' remark of
language of the Aestiorum gentes being similar to the lingua
Britannicae (Okulicz believes the Aestii and the Veneti spoke related
languages).


Torsten