Re: PIE initial *a

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 58458
Date: 2008-05-13

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 6:25 PM
> Subject: [tied] Re: PIE initial *a
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Piotr, we all know that in -*ak^-, the 'Laryngeal' Theory supposes
> that *H2
> > colors -*ék^- to -*ák^-.
> >
> > My question is: does the 'Laryngeal' Theory assume that _all_ PIE
> initial
> > *a- stems from this combination only or does it regard some
initial
> *a- as
> > being from an original short *a-?
>
> > Patrick
> >
>
>
> All initial a- are considered to be from h2e- due to the following
> PIE Root Constraint:
> -> a PIE Root always starts with a Non-Vocalic.
>
> Marius
>
> ***
>
> Patrick:
>
> So, Marius, if I supposed the initial were *H which had no coloring
> properties, i.e. *Hak^-, there would be no problem?
>
> ***
>


Yes, a Root Hak^ is acceptable regarding the PIE Constraints

where H can be any of {h1,h2,h3}

Marius

P.S.:
Leiden School (and not only) reject the existence of <a> in Early PIE
Times because is rare...but this is another Subject