Re: Grimm 's Law fact or myth: Gessman (1990)

From: tgpedersen
Message: 58414
Date: 2008-05-09

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
>
> At 5:44:52 PM on Thursday, May 8, 2008, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan"
> > <proto-language@> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Secondly, I do not see Mr. Kelkar pushing his
> >> interpretation of history though that may be his ultimate
> >> motivation.
>
> > I can't figure out what his motivation is for attacking
> > Grimm's law. Why is that so important to him?
>
> I don't think that he cares one way or the other about
> Grimm's Law: for obvious reasons he likes anything that
> suggests that some traditional tenet of IE linguistics is
> wrong. And if he realized that Gessman's 'Proto-Aryan' is
> PIE, he may well have seen in 'The Proto-Aryan basis on
> which [the 'Germanic Consonant Shift'] had been predicated
> has vanished' a confirmation of his position that PIE is a
> figment of the imaginations of Eurocentric linguists.

Well, it's not just this one time, he's done it on several occasions.
But maybe we should ask him ourselves. What benefit do you think get
if you could disprove Grimm's law?


Torsten