Re: beyond langauges

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mkelkar2003" <swatimkelkar@...>
> > >
> > > The complete idiocy is to put Indo-European in here,
> > > in a family made of Asiatic languages.
> > > So long as a super-family will start with that premice, it's
> >> dead-born.
> > >
>
> > How could anything European be connected to Asia? That just would not
> > make sense to a European.
> > M. Kelkar
>
> =========
>
> M. Kelkar
>
> I don't understand what you mean.
>
> I consider PIE originates in Anatolia (= ASIA minor)
> and PIE is part of PAA (a north african family).
>
> Please explain.
>
> Arnaud

That would make PIE an Asian lanague. So why did you write the following?

"The complete idiocy is to put Indo-European in here,

> > in a family made of Asiatic languages.
> > So long as a super-family will start with that premice, it's
>> dead-born."

Is Asia minor different from Asia? Please explain your 'premice' or
premise.

M. Kelkar

> ============
>