Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: beyond langauges

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: beyond langauges


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>

<...>

> >> > Define the characteristics of "proof positive" for you in this
> >> > context
> >> > if
> >> > you would.
> >> >
> >> > ***
> >>
> >> A set of proto-phonemes
> >> with consistent and plausible sound changes
> >> explaining say 500 words
> >> could do the job.
> >>
> >> Arnaud
> >>
> >> ===========
> > ***
> > > Patrick:
> > > That has already been done by Bomhard.
> > >
> > ***
>
> I don't think &h can be a phoneme of PIE
> and I don't think tl > k makes sense.
> So it's not done.
>
> Arnaud

***

Patrick:

Who cares what you think? You are not really qualified to have a thought in
discussion of this kind.

***