From: Rick McCallister
Message: 58139
Date: 2008-04-27
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "afyangh"No, you don't pay attention. Mitanni IA is not
> <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > That is not comparable. There is also a
> geography factor here.
> > > Mittani Indo-Aryan and regular IA are found
> thousands of miles apart.
> > > After spliting from IIr one branch went to the
> near east with their
> > > aika language and the other went to India with
> their eka language.
> > > They both cannot be called Indo-Aryan.
> > >
> > > M. Kelkar
> > > >
> > >
> > =====
> >
> > Quebec French is not French, according to you ?
> > Because of the geographical distance.
> >
> > It's fascinating to look at the terminological
> twist-in twist-out that
> > you are trying to achieve, to make the obvious
> look unclear.
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
>
> Since Mittani Indo-Aryan aika is earlier than
> Indo-Aryan Sanskrit eka
> those Indo-Aryans must have taken a silly detour to
> India then. I see
> it now.
>
> M. Kelkar
>
>