Re: beyond langauges

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "afyangh" <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:

>
>
> >
> > That is not comparable. There is also a geography factor here.
> > Mittani Indo-Aryan and regular IA are found thousands of miles apart.
> > After spliting from IIr one branch went to the near east with their
> > aika language and the other went to India with their eka language.
> > They both cannot be called Indo-Aryan.
> >
> > M. Kelkar
> > >
> >
> =====
>
> Quebec French is not French, according to you ?
> Because of the geographical distance.
>
> It's fascinating to look at the terminological twist-in twist-out that
> you are trying to achieve, to make the obvious look unclear.
>
> Arnaud
>

Since Mittani Indo-Aryan aika is earlier than Indo-Aryan Sanskrit eka
those Indo-Aryans must have taken a silly detour to India then. I see
it now.

M. Kelkar