Re: Magyar uveg <-> Romanian uiag&

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" <alxmoeller@> wrote:
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 1)-reducing the geminate ( uw= uu=u),
> >
> > This is Not true for Romanian : vaduwa was maintained
> > (See Old Romanian /v&duwa/ > v&duva)
>
> these are separat syllable, there is no gemination there !!!!
> va-du-va, ma-du-va
>

u-veg have different 2 syllables either.
u-ya-ga also
(v&-)-du-wa also
(m&-)-du-wa also

I don't see any difference

> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 2) yotacising of "e" to "ie"
> >
> > This is Not true either.
> > The transformation e>ye/ya is ended "End Of Roman Period"
>
>
> What does makes you to think that way. This change of "e" to "ie"

and

> then to "ia" will work even today, where is the problem?
>

I "cannot see" any ye in cle's,te /kle'shte/. Can you?

Trust me that e/accented > ye/ya is ended Before Slavs Arrival


Marius